Learning to be Fair in Multiplayer Ultimatum Games: (Extended Abstract)
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study a multiplayer extension of the well-known Ultimatum Game (UG) through the lens of a reinforcement learning algorithm. Multiplayer Ultimatum Game (MUG) allows us to study fair behaviors beyond the traditional pairwise interaction models. Here, a proposal is made to a quorum of Responders, and the overall acceptance depends on reaching a threshold of individual acceptances. We show that learning agents coordinate their behavior into different strategies, depending on factors such as the group acceptance threshold and the group size. Overall, our simulations show that stringent group criteria trigger fairer proposals and the effect of group size on fairness depends on the same group acceptance criteria.
منابع مشابه
Dynamics of Fairness in Groups of Autonomous Learning Agents
Fairness plays a determinant role in human decisions and definitely shapes social preferences. This is evident when groups of individuals need to divide a given resource. Notwithstanding, computational models seeking to capture the origins and effects of human fairness often assume the simpler case of two person interactions. Here we study a multiplayer extension of the well-known Ultimatum Gam...
متن کاملA Closed-Form Formula for the Fair Allocation of Gains in Cooperative N-Person Games
Abstract This paper provides a closed-form optimal solution to the multi-objective model of the fair allocation of gains obtained by cooperation among all players. The optimality of the proposed solution is first proved. Then, the properties of the proposed solution are investigated. At the end, a numerical example in inventory control environment is given to demonstrate the application and t...
متن کاملRegret Minimization in Multiplayer Extensive Games
The counterfactual regret minimization (CFR) algorithm is state-of-the-art for computing strategies in large games and other sequential decisionmaking problems. Little is known, however, about CFR in games with more than 2 players. This extended abstract outlines research towards a better understanding of CFR in multiplayer games and new procedures for computing even stronger multiplayer strate...
متن کاملMore Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games
This paper examines Allocators’ willingness to reward and punish their paired Recipients. Recipients only compete in a skill-testing contest, the outcome of which determines the size of the surplus. In the dictator game, Allocators reward skillful Recipients, but punish unskillful ones only modestly. The punishment effect is mitigated by the belief held by some Allocators that effort is the app...
متن کاملNeural mechanism of proposer's decision-making in the ultimatum and dictator games☆
Previous studies have demonstrated that reactions to unfair offers in the ultimatum game are correlated with negative emotion. However, little is known about the difference in neural activity between a proposer's decision-making in the ultimatum game compared with the dictator game. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging study revealed that proposing fair offers in the dictator game ...
متن کامل